Earlier this year my 80-200 f2.8 broke (well, I broke it by dropping on concrete). Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II was too expensive, could not find used VR I in good condition so I ended up buying 70-200 2.8 stabilized sigma. Sigma turned out to be a very nice lens with faster and more accurate autofocus on my D300 and additional benefit of good

Captured with the 70-200mm f/4 lens. As a landscape photographer, itโ€™s rare that you need f/2.8, especially for the type of images I tend to capture. Itโ€™s more important for me to save weight (1540 gm/3.2 lbs versus 850 gm/1.9 lbs) since my backpack gets quite heavy when carrying all my lenses and cameras, a tripod, and other accessories. At 100mm the 100-400 is f/4.5 vs f/2.8 so at lower focal lengths, the 70-200 wins, but when you extend out to 400mm you will be getting the equivalent DOF. Letโ€™s be clear, Iโ€™m not proposing the 100-400 as a shallow DOF portrait lens, just saying under the right conditions you could achieve similar outcomes.

The 70-200 mm 2.8 will give me an professional grade lens in a range that I use very often. With the TC, it will also give me the extended range that I sorely miss for the occasional birding / fleet week / wildlife shooting / super moon opportunity. I am very tempted to go with this option.

August 8, 2023, Commack, New York โ€“ Tamron announces the development of the 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VC VXD G2 (Model A065), a fast-aperture telephoto zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras. The lens is expected to be available in the Fall 2023. The 70-180mm F2.8 G2 marks the further evolution of the first-generation model that
Hello, I own a 70-200 F2.8 VR II, which is a great lens. 47 Nikon Software; 26 Nikon Deals; 760 General Discussions; 49 Gear Reviews; 180 Other Manufacturers; 105
C0humak. 246 477 98 383 413 164 193 23 17

nikon 70 200 f4 vs f2 8